Previous Page  25 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 25 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

November 2015 //

Canadian Government Executive /

25

modern tools and modern skills. Most

importantly, they need talented man-

agers and management structures that

will equip and empower them to do their

jobs effectively. Policies require effective

implementation to reach their intended

goals.”

The Advisory Committee’s report spe-

cifically addresses “operational pace,”

which it defines as “the speed at which

departments and agencies are able to

anticipate and respond to the needs and

expectations of Canadians and the Gov-

ernment.” In the world of project man-

agement, PMI would describe this as the

need to practice agility. Though the term

agility has been used in project manage-

ment for the past two decades to refer to

a series of practices and approaches, it is

taking on new meaning as organizations

recognize its value as a strategic compe-

tence. Organizations that use more than

one approach to project management

are able to reconfigure their processes

and combine different tools and tech-

niques to address their own distinctive

challenges.

In today’s fast-moving, perpetually

changing landscape, this is an essential

strategic competency, and one that is

of particular importance to long-term

initiatives such as Blueprint 2020. As

the advisory committee stated in its re-

port: “We strongly believe that the right

kind of process improvements (what we

would call in the private sector ‘reduc-

ing cycle time’ and introducing modern

project management techniques) are in

everyone’s interest, and certainly that of

the Canadian public.”

Similarly, a formal decision-making

process is necessary to help ensure proj-

ect and program success. PMI’s Pulse

of the Profession: Capturing the Value

of Project Management Through Deci-

sion Making, released earlier this year,

reveals that when decision making is

approached with discipline, 79 percent

more projects meet their original goals

and business intent. Informed decisions

guide projects and programs through

planning, implementation and comple-

tion. To achieve key objectives, organi-

zations must proactively empower proj-

ect teams by consistently providing the

right information to decision makers at

critical points in the project lifecycle.

Among the most significant road-

blocks to good decision making – and

therefore to project and program suc-

cess -- is a shortage of actionable infor-

mation available to key project players at

the point of decision. According to PMI’s

research, decision makers in 81 percent

of organizations don’t always have ac-

cess to what they need. In fact, they of-

ten lack even the most fundamental in-

formation, such as risk assessments (46

percent), insight into available resources

(40 percent) and full knowledge of proj-

ect requirements (35 percent).

Another prominent challenge project

decision makers face is a disconnect

between project-level actions and high-

level organizational strategy. Only one in

five organizations report decision mak-

ers at the project level are always familiar

with strategy and how projects support

it. Consequently, most organizations are

failing to benefit from the efficiencies

good decisions deliver. When decision

makers are familiar with organizational

strategy all the time, an average of 78

percent of their organizations’ projects

meet original goals, versus 43 percent,

when they are not familiar with strategy.

The Importance of Highly-

Engaged and Effective Executive

Sponsors

Given the ambitious goals of the fed-

eral Public Service’s Blueprint 2020, its

various initiatives will require the active

engagement of executive sponsors – se-

nior administration personnel who make

the “business case” for a project and

then champion its value and obtain the

necessary organizational resources to

make the project viable. Where a project

manager leads, the executive sponsor

operates at the highest level of an orga-

nization’s management structure to lay

out the requirements and hold others to

account. The sponsor initiates and signs

off on the project, promoting the change

and benefits it is designed to deliver.

Here again, there is cause for optimism

in reviewing the Prime Minister’s Advi-

sory Committee report. In the report’s

2015

Capturing the Value of

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

conclusions, the Committee writes the

following about Blueprint 2020’s objec-

tives: “Prime Minister, all this will require

the commitment of the highest levels of

government – from you and the Cabi-

net to the Clerk and deputy ministers,

a commitment that you and the Clerk

have already confirmed to us. Your sup-

port for the Public Service will foster

confidence in employees and public

confidence in government as a whole.”

The Advisory Committee’s focus on

project management, which includes

the use of modern project management

techniques, recruitment and leadership

development to manage government

projects effectively, is an important step

forward. Assuming the federal govern-

ment follows through on the approach-

es outlined in the Advisory Committee’s

report, PMI’s research indicates a high

probability of Blueprint 2020 achieving

its goals and delivering significant long-

term value to the citizens of Canada.

Visit

www.PMI.org/Pulse

to download the reports.