Canada’s federal government budget is
without a doubt the largest in the coun-
try — so when Canadian taxpayer dollars
are at stake, it is essential the govern-
ment utilizes the tools necessary to ob-
tain the greatest return on investment.
The use of globally accepted project
management strategies in federal gov-
ernment standardizes the way in which
the government and supporting contrac-
tors view project and program frame-
works. This results in better acquisition
efficiencies, improved requirements and
increased value to the taxpayer.
Implementing project management
competencies in federal government in-
creases the portability of project manag-
ers in the industry. Installing these frame-
works entices qualified project managers
to join the public sector if their skillsets
translate more directly to the field.
I strongly encourage the Canadian
federal government to pay close atten-
tion to the PMIAA and observe how a
bipartisan majority is passing this heavily
supported legislation through the United
States government. Setting government-
wide program management standards is
the first twist of the tourniquet that will
stop the bleeding of wasted money and
resources. Using frequent project man-
agement standards is a mandatory step
toward generating a successful return on
investment.
Craig Killough,
Vice President,
Organization Markets,
Project Management
Institute (PMI).
Special Report
L
ast fall, the United States Senate
unani
mously approved legisla-
tion that would make significant
improvements to program and
project management policy across the
U.S. government. The Program Manage-
ment Improvement and Accountability
Act (PMIAA) of 2015 was greeted with
rare bipartisan support in the U.S. Senate
and is awaiting action in the U.S. House
of Representatives later this year.
The legislation is aimed at safeguarding
taxpayer dollars by integrating proven
project management approaches across
U.S. federal government departments.
The proposed implementation of estab-
lished project management strategies
would result in a more streamlined fed-
eral government carrying out policy to
correct widespread deficiencies, careless
oversight and unnecessary cost overruns
incurred by preventable delays in meet-
ing stated program goals and deadlines.
The widely supported bipartisan bill in-
cludes principles of improving efficiency
and reducing waste in federal govern-
ment projects and programs through the:
• Creation of a formal job series and ca-
reer path for program managers in the
federal government;
• Development of a standards-based
model for program management con-
sistent throughout the federal govern-
ment;
• Recognition of the essential role of ex-
ecutive sponsorship and engagement
by designating a senior executive in
each agency to be responsible for pro-
gram management policy and strategy;
• Alignment of cross-government dia-
logue on program management prac-
tices through an interagency council on
program management.
These reforms are consistent with Proj-
ect Management Institute (PMI) re-
search, which shows that organizations
that invest in program management
improve outcomes, accountability and
By Craig Killough,
Vice President, Organization Markets, PMI
Visit
www.PMI.org/Pulseto download the reports.
efficiency. The findings of our
Pulse of
the Profession
report indicate that stan-
dardized approaches, engaged executive
sponsors and certified professionals are
fundamental building blocks for all orga-
nizations seeking to achieve the highest
levels of performance.
Improving programmanagement leads
to benefits such as increased collabora-
tion, improved decision making, and re-
duced risk. And as diverse and complex
as the federal government is, the utiliza-
tion of sound program management is
the kind of widely applicable tool need-
ed to address some lingering and funda-
mental challenges.
An institution known for its bureaucrat-
ic nature, the U.S. government has recog-
nized the need to improve its efficiency
and reduce its waste. Passage of PMIAA
is an acknowledgement of the value a
sound project management framework
delivers and how it can lead to signifi-
cant benefits for government projects
and programs in the long run.
The key elements of this common
sense legislation are equally applicable
in Canada. PMI’s research reveals that,
globally, organizations waste an average
of $122 million for every $1 billion spent
on projects. It would be naïve to think
that the Canadian federal government —
or any government body, for that matter
— cannot significantly improve its per-
formance.
While the Canadian federal govern-
ment has a tremendous taxonomy of
projects and programs via its Project
Complexity and Risk Assessment (PCRA)
tool, there remains the opportunity to
place greater emphasis on aligning com-
petencies and career paths to its gradi-
ent and, as a result standardize the lens
through which federal stakeholders view
the management of federal projects and
programs. Doing so would put a credible
human capital strategy in place to ensure
that each level of project and program
has the necessary project leader.
June 2016 //
Canadian Government Executive /
21
US Project Management Legislation –
A Complimentary Model for Canada
Effort to Improve Project Management Practices
across Federal Government Gaining Steam in U.S.