Previous Page  4 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Our mission is to contribute to excellence in public service management

Editorial

Editor-in-Chief:

Patrice Dutil

editor@netgov.ca www.patricedutil.com

Associate Editor:

Marcello Sukhdeo

assoceditor@netgov.ca

Editorial Advisory Board

Vic Pakalnis, Mirarco, Laurentian University; Denise Amyot,

CEO, ACCC; Lisa Sullivan, Federal Youth Network; Jodi LeBlanc,

Veterans Affairs; Guy Gordon, Manitoba; Peter Jones, OCADU;

Murray Kronick, BDO-Interis Consulting; Michael Eastman,

Government Internal Auditors Council of Canada

sales

VP Content & Business Strategy:

Marcello Sukhdeo

905-727-4091, x224

marcellos@netgov.ca

Vice President, Sales:

Terri Pavelic

905-727-4091 x225

terrip@netgov.ca

Events

Director, Social Content & Events:

Laskey S. Hart

905-727-4091, x235

laskeyh@netgov.ca

art & production

Art Director:

Elena Pankova

artwork@netgov.ca

Subscriptions and Address Changes

Circulation Director:

Mary Labao

905-841-7389

circulation@netgov.ca

General Inquiries

23-4 Vata Court, Aurora, ON, L4G 4B6

Phone 905-727 4091 Fax 905-727-4428

www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca

corporate

Group Publisher:

John Jones

publisher@netgov.ca

Publisher’s Mail Agreement:

41132537 ISSN 1203-7893

Canadian Government Executive

magazine is published 10 times per

year by Navatar Press. All opinions expressed herein are those of the

contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher

or any person or organization associated with the magazine. Letters,

submissions, comments and suggested topics are welcome, and should

be sent to

editor@netgov.ca

Reprint Information:

Reproduction or photocopying is prohibited without the publisher’s prior

written consent. High quality reprints of articles and additional copies of

the magazine are available through

circulation@netgov.ca

Privacy Policy:

We do not sell our mailing list or share any

confidential information on our subscribers.

We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada

through the Canada Periodical Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities.

www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca

4

/ Canadian Government Executive

// September 2016

Deliverology as Routine

Almost exactly mid-way in writing his

How to Run a Government So That Citizens Benefit

and Taxpayers Don’t Go Crazy

(2015), Michael Barber put down his pen and savoured

a moment. He then wrote the passage where he describes the scrambling around 10

Downing in anticipation of the first campaign for re-election in 2001. The Blair govern-

ment was looking for new ideas and new solutions, and the issue of crime made it onto

the agenda.

Barber, the father of the “Deliverology” approach to ensuring government perfor-

mance, recalled the frantic search for new approaches and knew he needed to get out

of it in order to focus. It was then that he asked to carve out of the Prime Minister’s

Office the “Delivery Unit” that made his fame. The idea of that institutional novelty

was precisely to ignore the hubbub, to achieve routine: “routine reporting, routine data

collection, routine monitoring, routine problem-solving” as he put it. It was the prize he

reached for desperately: the idea of achieving the extraordinary “ordinary.”

Barber described the beauty of “government by routine.” It has clear priorities, a

specific idea of success, careful and intelligent oversight, a reliance on hard data, a

grounding in “honest conversation” that prizes regular contact between any given

department’s nerve endings and its decision-making centre. It is, in other words, the

dream of any public sector leader. Barber depicts a government that is in such routine

control that it is boring. He even goes to some length (never boring, that) to describe the

structure of this briefing notes to the PM.

Barber even says he wanted boring meetings—boring in structure but lively in content.

Barber favored regular, relatively brief meetings that focused on no more than two items.

He wanted candid conversation, so the number of people attending had to be kept to the

minimum. There was no time or room for grandstanding or for those who triggered it.

Critical to the success was the unimpeachability of the data—and those who challenged

it would be chased away. What he desperately hoped for was a collaborative atmosphere,

one that engendered genuine discussion on the continuous validity of objectives and

outcomes and on the adjustments in policy and programs that needed to be made

en

route

. Barber called these meetings to “stocktake.” They were designed to be part of the

ordinary, yet they were critical to ensuring that state of affairs. These meetings were the

parents, not the offspring, of his approach to improving government’s ability to deliver.

Well conceived, well led, these meetings become the battlefield for anticipated problems,

not for current crises. Heaven happens in ordinary time.

As the government continues its journey towards applying this management ideal, this

month’s

Canadian Government Executive

features three articles that tackle the challenge

of “deliverology” from three distinct angles. Warren McCay and Courtney Brown exam-

ine the contribution internal audit can make in moving the bureaucracy towards better

data collection. Jessica Sultan and Claude Miville-Dechêne, for their part, look at how

the procurement process can contribute an extra layer of vigilance. Craig Szelestowski

contributes five distinct strategies that can be borrowed from the very influential “Lean

Movement” to lead the way towards the Holy Grail of “ordinariness.” David Zussman

concludes with a pithy insight on the “Results” approach of the Trudeau government.

That ordinariness can become nothing but a wishful thought by a cyber-attack. In this

issue, two articles examine strategies in dealing with material no one sees. John Weigelt

of Microsoft Canada describes how a few governments in his experience have strategized

to make use of the “cloud” in linking its systems and data—two vital ingredients in mak-

ing the state hum. I take a look at the Government of Canada’s rampart against cyber-

crime, the Canadian Cyber Incident Response Centre and what it has done over the past

five years in ensuring that the Internet on which we all depend maintains its integrity. It

has become, after all, one of the vital ingredients of routine in this country.

See you on 5 October at the CGE Conference on Deliverology in Ottawa. It is going to

change your mind about things (see the ad on page 31).

editor’s note

Patrice Dutil

web