Previous Page  26 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 26 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

W

e’ve all been warned not to over-

manage – become a hen-pecking,

micro-manager, obsessing about de-

tails, instead of delegating wisely.

But consultant Bruce Tulgan believes the opposite,

under-management, is epidemic. Indeed, he insists

it’s hiding in plain sight, but we don’t notice.

“It is so often what’s going wrong in so many

workplaces. It is rampant. It is costly. It’s very easy

to treat, but it is very hard to cure. The medicine

is strong, so when you feel better it’s tempting to

water it down. But as soon as you stop taking the

strong medicine, you start to get sick again,” he

writes in

The 27 Challenges Managers Face.

A test about how prominent it is in your work-

place is to ask whether you or your colleagues are

often in firefighting mode, responding to threaten-

ing events and getting everything running smooth-

ly again before the next spontaneous eruption.

Most of those fires can be prevented in advance, he

contends, by properly practising the fundamentals

of management, holding regular check-ins with

staff to understand what’s happening and to keep

them on track. That’s the stiff medicine you need

to take.

“What’s amazing is that so few managers in the

real world consistently practise the fundamentals

very well. What’s even more amazing is that so

many managers think they are doing it, when they

are not,” he observes.

Before we get to the fundamentals, let’s look

at how he says you are likely spending your day:

Caught up in four pernicious time drains. First, you

attend too many mediocre group meetings. Second,

you wade through a never-ending tidal wave of

email. Third, you are interrupting others and be-

ing interrupted, making concentration and focus

for you and your colleagues difficult. Finally, you

touch base lightly with direct reports, checking in

and shooting the breeze. “How are you?” “How’s

everything going?” “Is everything on track?” “Are

there any problems I should know about?” Those

are open-ended questions, designed to keep you

plugged in, but in fact they prove to be gestures,

because the responses are generally vague, limp

or avoided. You end up shooting the breeze rather

than tackling anything substantive.

Managers try to manage performance through

annual performance reviews, but those invariably

are unsuccessful as they aren’t immediate and we

shy away from confrontation. In recent years, there

have been a multitude of calls to manage perfor-

mance on the run, in the heat of the action – every

day, or week, as event crop up. But instead, we ask

puffball questions. “How are you?” “How’s every-

thing going?” “Is everything on track?” “Are there

any problems I should know about?”

He prescribes highly structured and highly

substantive check-ins – perhaps once a day or at

least every few days, depending on the situation.

You need to make expectations clear; track per-

formance and provide ongoing, candid feedback;

and recognize and reward when performance war-

rants. Through that rigorous approach – the strong

medicine to counter undermanagement – account-

ability becomes a process rather than a slogan.

Let’s start with highly-structured. Set aside an

hour a day for your one-on-ones, concentrating

on three or four subordinates. In an ideal world,

he says you would talk to every direct report every

day but that’s probably impossible so you will have

to make choices. Don’t reject his conversational ap-

proach because you lack the time – you’re trapped

in those four pernicious time drains. This is some-

thing you must do, and if it results in fewer fires to

beat back as he believes, that will grant you more

The Leader’s Bookshelf

Harvey Schachter

Are you an Undermanager?

The 27

Challenges

Managers Face

By Bruce Tulgan

Jossey-Bass, 242

pages, $34.00

26

/ Canadian Government Executive

// February 2016

Management is undermined

by pernicious time drains:

-mediocre group meetings

-the tidal wave of email

-constant interruptions

-insignificant bi-lateral

meetings with reports