Previous Page  4 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 4 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

Our mission is to contribute to excellence in public service management

Editorial

Editor-in-Chief:

Patrice Dutil

editor@netgov.ca www.patricedutil.com

Associate Editor:

Nestor Arellano

assoceditor@netgov.ca

Editorial Advisory Board

Vic Pakalnis, Mirarco, Laurentian University; Denise Amyot,

CEO, ACCC; Nick Frate, Federal Youth Network; Jodi LeBlanc,

Veterans Affairs; Guy Gordon, Manitoba; Shelley Pelkey,

Institute of Internal Audit; Peter Jones, OCADU; Murray

Kronick, Interis Consulting

sales

Director, Content & Business Development:

José Labao

905-727-4091, x231

josel@netgov.ca

Vice President, Sales:

Terri Pavelic

905-727-4091 x225

terrip@netgov.ca

Events

Director, Social Content & Events:

Laskey S. Hart

905-727-4091, x235

laskeyh@netgov.ca

art & production

Art Director:

Elena Pankova

artwork@netgov.ca

Subscriptions and Address Changes

Circulation Director:

Mary Labao

905-841-7389

circulation@netgov.ca

General Inquiries

23-4 Vata Court, Aurora, ON, L4G 4B6

Phone 905-727 4091 Fax 905-727-4428

www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca

corporate

Group Publisher:

John Jones

publisher@netgov.ca

Publisher’s Mail Agreement:

41132537 ISSN 1203-7893

Canadian Government Executive

magazine is published 10 times per

year by Navatar Press. All opinions expressed herein are those of the

contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher

or any person or organization associated with the magazine. Letters,

submissions, comments and suggested topics are welcome, and should

be sent to

editor@netgov.ca

Reprint Information:

Reproduction or photocopying is prohibited without the publisher’s prior

written consent. High quality reprints of articles and additional copies of

the magazine are available through

circulation@netgov.ca

Privacy Policy:

We do not sell our mailing list or share any

confidential information on our subscribers.

We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada

through the Canada Periodical Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities.

www.canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca

4

/ Canadian Government Executive

// March 2016

It’s been a long time since a public administration theorist has made such waves in the

national capital, or in any capital, for that matter. As the throne speech was being read

late last fall, a flutter of wings and murmurs announced that “deliverology” was coming to

town. Sir Michael Barber landed a few weeks later to deliver the new tablets.

Just what is this new panacea? Does Ottawa have a serious case of implementation

inertia? How did we know we had such a problem? There’s no doubt deadlines are

missed. Fingers get pointed. At the same time, vaguest-of-the-vague program and poli-

cy outcomes are pronounced as “met” in some “result-based” strategic plan. No wonder

people—public servants and parliamentarians—get lost. Clearly, the new government in

Ottawa is concerned about this.

The approach proposed by Sir Michael has taken the town by storm. Who is he?

Michael Barber studied history before he received his teacher’s degree. This is impor-

tant—he has the habit of taking the long view and he’s curious about original intentions

and how programs shift priorities over time. He then taught, both in the UK and in Af-

rica. It’s not clear how long he actually worked in a classroom as his career took him into

the policy field, first with the teachers’ union, and then in the Labour Party. He ran for

parliament, unsuccessfully, some thirty years ago and turned to teaching.

He’s the epitome of a reflective practitioner, generously sharing his insights in many

books. The latest (both published in 2015),

Deliverology in Practice

and

How to Run a Gov-

ernment

, are very different. Where the former is practically a step-by-step guide on how

to get things done, the latter is more of an exploration of his international consulting

activities. Both books tell the story of what it takes to actually deliver.

Deliverology in Practice

won’t be foreign to anyone who has done program evaluations

and/or managed a program. There’s actually very little, on a theoretical plane, that is

new here. Focusing on deliverables in the USA educational space, Barber and his two co-

authors discuss “defining aspirations,” “Review the Current State of Delivery,” and “estab-

lish a guiding coalition.” There are observations on “evaluating past and present perfor-

mance” and “understanding root causes of performance.” Then there’s talk about setting

objectives, solving problems early, communicating results and, my favourite, unleashing

the “alchemy of relationships.”

How to Run a Government,

I suspect, gets a lot closer to the truth of success. Barber

was lucky enough to have attracted a prime minister that had a fetish for administrative

detail. Tony Blair noticed that the stories of success he was receiving from the depart-

ment of education (where Barber was a key adviser) were of an entirely different quality

than what he was getting elsewhere. The solution? Get Barber to move into 10 Downing

(2001-2005) and set the machinery so that more government departments actually move

towards improving delivery on policy decisions. He’s taught that principle ever since.

I strongly suspect that Ottawa knows the recipes; it’s the political glue that’s been hard

to find. In almost all the cases Barber discusses in

How to Run a Government

, one senses

the vital contribution of a political actor that is genuinely interested in getting involved

to resolve difficulties and open doors. It’s not an accident that Barber may have been suc-

cessful in London precisely because he had the Prime Minister’s sponsorship—a PM that

was willing to spend to get the results he wanted. The spending factor was key here—per-

haps far more than a new control mechanism. This experience was borne out in Ontario

where Barber’s ideas on educational reforms were applied, along with massive increases

in funding. You don’t achieve this sort of success from the bottom floors of the TBS.

Canada’s new prime minister has no record of management. What is new is a faith in

the bureaucracy, a willingness to spend, and a hope that with some political weight, the

right priorities will be addressed at the right time and in the right way. So here’s hoping

that Barberology’s lessons won’t be lost in Ottawa—both the administrative ones and the

political ones.

Sir Michael, I presume?

editor’s note

Patrice Dutil

web