Previous Page  22 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 22 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

22

/ Canadian Government Executive

// April 2016

T

he vast majority (88 percent)

of Chief Audit Executives in

North America report function-

ally to an Audit Committee or

its equivalent. These Audit Committees

typically perform an oversight function:

they approve the Internal Audit Charter

and the audit plan and they also evaluate

and assess the compensation of the Chief

Auditor. It is a critical relationship, and it

can be fragile. For those reasons it is im-

perative to build and maintain an effec-

tive relationship.

It may be argued that without oversight,

strategic guidance or support from the

Audit Committee, it is very difficult for

an Internal Audit department to be suc-

cessful in its mandate. Likewise, an Audit

Committee can be more effective in car-

rying out its mandate with the support of

a high performing Internal Audit depart-

ment.

Bruce Webster dedicated three of his

20 Questions Directors Should Ask about Internal

Audit

(CPA Canada, 2016) to this topic. Spe-

cifically, Webster addresses the question

“How can the Board optimize its relation-

ship with the Chief Audit Executive?” He

provides improvement opportunities and

goes on to say “The relationship between

the Chair of the Audit Committee and the

CAE is critical for Internal Audit to maxi-

mize its value to the Board.”

Every relationship is a dance and, like-

wise, the rapport between an Internal Au-

dit department and the Audit Committee

is dynamic and requires on-going atten-

tion. Here are three key steps a proactive

Internal Audit department can take to in-

crease the effectiveness of their relation-

ship with the Audit Committee:

1

Provide a clear

understanding of Internal

Audit’s role to ensure

alignment with the needs

and expectations of the

Audit Committee.

• Educate the Audit Committee on Inter-

nal Audit’s Charter, role & activities

• Review the Audit Committee Charter,

activities and processes

• Encourage discussion on strategic direc-

tion of the Internal Audit department

• Ensure Internal Audit understands and

supports the needs and responsibilities

of the Audit Committee

• Have a clear understanding of the Audit

Committee expectation of Internal Au-

dit.

Ask them what they would consider a

best-in-class or high value Internal Audit

function and align Internal Audit’s pro-

cesses and activities accordingly.

• Discuss with the Audit Committee how

Internal Audit fits into the overall gover-

nance design of the organization and co-

ordinated assurance activities. As an im-

portant aspect of its mandate, Internal

Audit can provide the Audit Committee

with a means of monitoring the controls

that management has put in place are

functioning reliably and sufficiently to

address the key risks of the enterprise.

Refer to IIA Position Paper: The Three

Lines of Defence in Effective Risk Manage-

ment And Control.

Internal Audit

Gurmit

Aujla

Cindy

Kailly-

Smith

Care toWaltz?

Developing an Effective Relationship between

Internal Audit and the Audit Committee