Previous Page  7 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 7 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

September 2015 //

Canadian Government Executive /

7

Service delivery

ers financial risk by highlighting what it

will really take to build and operate the

service before you’ve over invested.

But how do you “do” agile in govern-

ment? Is it really possible to “start now,

start small and work it out as you go?”

Booking a UK prison visit used to in-

volve lots of phone calls, lots of waiting,

and lots of paper. It consumed lots of pris-

on officer time, and was managed in lots

of different ways across lots of different

prisons. And, it led to lots of cancellations.

More than 160,000 of the 1.5 million visits

booked each year, cost some £600,000.

Prison service technology was some-

thing of a joke. Hundreds of millions of

pounds were sunk on a failed prison IT

system. Politicians scrutinising the failure

commented that, “in scales of comprehen-

siveness of incompetence” the implemen-

tation project was “largely unmatched.”

If ever a government agency had been

wounded by big bang launches, big IT

and big budget tech spending, this was it.

And so booking a prison visit became one

of the UK government’s first transactions

to be redesigned using a user-centred ag-

ile approach. As a start, a small team was

formed to build a picture of the context

for the service.

We call this first step “discovery.” It in-

corporated lots of user research with

social visitors, lawyers, prison staff, and

prisoners; lots of analysis of policy, le-

gal. and operational constraints; lots of

time behind bars, learning how you run

a prison, getting under the skin of the

visit-booking process; lots of conversations

to define how we measure success with

everyone from the Prison Service CEO to

frontline prison staff.

Armedwith the simple hypothesis that an

email booking sent to prison staff would be

more effective than the existing paper and

phone-based service, the team set about

building a working prototype. This would

be the MVP. Testing with real users would

allow the team to learn from it and iterate

toward a fully automated service.

The prototype used what we affection-

ately called a “human API” as workaround.

An API is an interface that allows you to

get data in, and out, of a system. In this

case, it simply meant that prison staff were

the link between booking the visit and the

business process in each prison.

Crucially, this allowed the team to put

the prototype to use in four prisons to

quickly understand what they got right,

and what they hadn’t. It sidestepped pain-

ful integration with legacy IT that would

likely have derailed the work.

From this early stage it was possible

to book a visit from a desktop or mobile

phone in just a few minutes, and prison

staff could approve visits quickly. But it

wasn’t perfect. As Reid Hoffman of Linke-

din says, “If you’re not embarrassed by

the first version of your product, you’ve

launched too late.” The point is to fail fast,

learn quickly, and improve continually.

The data from user testing shouted

loudly about the need for a standardized

visit booking process to work for all users,

across all prisons. Thanks to the learnings

from prototyping, the team were able to

iterate and scale the service making it op-

erational 24/7 in 96 prisons.

By the time the service was declared

“live” it had been fully tested. It met identi-

fied user needs, security, and performance

standards. The “analogue” visit booking

process was retired. And the right people

were in place to run and continue to im-

prove it.

Today it’s still changing in response to

feedback from users. That’s the whole

point. Taking small steps towards achiev-

ing a big goal. Always improving. Thanks

to the team’s agile approach, the goal of

a fully automated, real-time service that’s

every bit as good as buying a cinema tick-

et online is in sight. And it’s opened the

door to broader digital change in prisons.

By making it easier to book visits, pris-

oners will see more of their loved ones.

There’ll be more money available for

things like the playroom where kids can

visit their dads in a safe and friendly en-

vironment. Prison officers will have more

time for other duties to help prisons to run

more efficiently. Evidence suggests stron-

ger community links help rehabilitation.

Transformation isn’t just about websites.

This is changing by doing. Amazon —

bigger than many governments — has

done it by empowering small teams.

Lanyrd.com

did it by swift, iterative

change with proper user and operational

input and space to work it out as you go.

And the tech? Well, this is 2015, so that’s

rarely the hard part.

What is hard is that, to achieve all this,

government departments probably have

to reorganize, reskill, and reprioritize.

That’s been the UK experience where

some now say that government is the best

digital start-up in London. Closer to home,

it’s what is happening in the Government

of Saskatchewan, where the conditions

are being consciously created for a culture

of digital transformation through Sas-

katchewan.ca.

Among the quotes added to the walls at

Jen Pahlka’s Code for America is a rallying

call for digital government from the UK

Government’s Digital Chief Mike Bracken.

“The strategy is delivery.”

That should be the motto of every gov-

ernment executive in Canada.

R

oger

O

ldham

is senior director,

Strategy & Transformation, at FCV and

the former Chief Digital Officer in the

UK’s Ministry of Justice. Next month,

Roger Oldham looks at the third

ingredient for digital success —

getting the right digital leadership in

place.

If ever a government

agency had been

wounded by big

bang launches,

big IT and big bud-

get tech spending,

this was it.