Canadian Government Executive - Volume 22 - Issue 9

4 / 32

Our mission is to contribute to excellence in public service management
Editorial
Editor-in-Chief: Patrice Dutil
Associate Editor:Marcello Sukhdeo
Editorial Advisory Board
Vic Pakalnis, Mirarco, Laurentian University; Denise Amyot,
CEO, ACCC; Guy Gordon, Manitoba; Peter Jones, OCADU;
Murray Kronick, BDO-Interis Consulting; Michael Eastman,
Government Internal Auditors Council of Canada
sales
VP Content & Business Strategy: Marcello Sukhdeo
905-727-4091, x224
Vice President, Sales: Terri Pavelic
905-727-4091 x225
Events
Director, Social Content & Events: Laskey S. Hart
905-727-4091, x235
art & production
Art Director: Elena Pankova
Subscriptions and Address Changes
Circulation Director:Mary Labao
905-841-7389
General Inquiries
23-4 Vata Court, Aurora, ON, L4G 4B6
Phone 905-727 4091 Fax 905-727-4428
corporate
Group Publisher:John Jones
Publisher’s Mail Agreement: 40052410 ISSN 1203-7893
Canadian Government Executive magazine is published 10 times per
year by Navatar Press. All opinions expressed herein are those of the
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher
or any person or organization associated with the magazine. Letters,
submissions, comments and suggested topics are welcome, and should
be sent to
Reprint Information:
Reproduction or photocopying is prohibited without the publisher’s prior
written consent. High quality reprints of articles and additional copies of
the magazine are available through
Privacy Policy:
We do not sell our mailing list or share any
confidential information on our subscribers.
We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada
through the Canada Periodical Fund (CPF) for our publishing activities.
4 / Canadian Government Executive // November 2016
The Business of Canada
Faithful readers will remember that the cover story on last month’s issue was on the
Institute for Citizen-Centred Service’s new study, Taking Care of Business. A few weeks
ago, the Ontario Chamber of Commerce (OCC) published a study of its own entitled
Obstacles and Opportunities: The Importance of Small Business in Ontario. The publica-
tion of the two reports within weeks of each other was coincidental, but not entirely
surprising. Lawmakers and opinion-leaders are constantly asking: what can be done to
make Canadian industry more competitive in the global economy? And, more directly:
what can government do (or undo) to allow industry to be more productive, more ag-
gressive in exporting Canada’s excellent products?
Obstacles and Opportunities: The Importance of Small Business in Ontario quickly at-
tracted attention in Ontario. Its sponsor, the Ontario Chamber of Commerce, is a signifi-
cant stakeholder in this discussion as it represents small business in the province—that
sector represents 98 percent of total business and 66 percent of private sector employ-
ment. This is serious.
Based on a survey of its membership, the report called for a number of reforms to
take place in the province. Strikingly, the cost of electricity was identified as a top prior-
ity, with a third of respondents reporting that their payments to Ontario’s producers
were actually delaying or cancelling investments. No less than 38 percent of respon-
dents said that their electricity costs were jeopardizing their ability to complete. Not
surprisingly the OCC called on government to ensure that affordable energy be made
available to the business sector.
The OCC made sixteen recommendations in this report, ranging from reducing the
Business Education Tax to provincial-municipal cost-sharing on infrastructure. A few
point directly at the services provided by the state bureaucracies at all levels. Recom-
mendation 5 called for governments to “establish a regulatory concierge service to
assist small businesses in understanding, navigating and achieving compliance with
relevant regulatory requirements.” The report does not refer to BizPal, the intergovern-
mental service that does just that, which indicates to me that the service needs to be
ramped up even more—and promoted a lot better. It is cash-starved and it’s high time
all levels of government bring it up to web 2.0 standards, but more than that govern-
ments have to work a lot harder on reducing the administrative weight of complying
with regulations and standards.
What also struck me was the finding that almost 40 percent of respondents had trou-
ble filling job openings over the past 18 months because they could not find individuals
with the right qualifications. This has been a perennial problem, but surely the time
has come to apply new thinking to this policy challenge. The report’s more frightening
finding is that “more than half of Ontario’s small businesses think that Ontario is worse
off when it comes to building a 21st century workforce as compared to five years ago.”
I asked Allan O’Dette, the President and CEO of the OCC, to shed more light on his
report, and you’ll find the interview a few pages deeper.
Christopher Lau has also been worried about Canada’s competitiveness. He thinks the
issues are less about energy costs and more about getting businesses to think bigger. In
his contribution to this month’s issue, he explores the potential for a more behavioural-
ist approach to getting business owners to invest in productivity and think more boldly
about developing products and services for exports. It is not an easy task, and Lau knows
it. Still, he points to the Fraunhoffer movement in Germany (there are two such centres
in Ontario, one at McMaster University and one at Western University) and makes the
argument that this method might well be implemented more widely in Canada.
This is thinking in the right direction. It matters to the team behind CGE because the
magazine you are reading (in your hands or on your screen) is the product of a small
business. It also matters because we recognize that without clever thinking—and, more
importantly, action on behalf of the public service to indeed find the ways to support
small and medium businesses grow—Canada’s economic health will indeed be imper-
iled. It may well be a wonderful thing to be able to access the European Common
Market without the imposition of tariffs; we also need the products and services their
citizens and businesses will want to buy.
editor’s note Patrice Dutil
web