Previous Page  30 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 30 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

30

/ Canadian Government Executive

// October 2016

The Last Word

David Zussman

A

t the end of August, when most Canadians were enjoy-

ing their summer vacations, Prime Minister Trudeau

made a number of significant changes to the structure

and composition of his cabinet committees. This move

was not unexpected given that the government has been in office

for almost one year and the Prime Minister and his staff have had

ample opportunity judge the effectiveness of the cabinet system

they implemented when the Government was sworn in on No-

vember 4, 2015.

This is a government in a big hurry to meet the high expecta-

tions that it has carefully nurtured among Canadians. To date, it

has initiated more than 120 consultations in diverse policy areas

and the Prime Minister likes to remind Canadians of his policy

priorities. However, time flies quickly in the life of a government

and, as a result, the election gurus in the Liberal party of Canada

can sense that the window is closing on some of their more am-

bitious and complex policy initiatives such as climate change,

health care reform, and trade agreements.

Given the new sense of urgency, this is a good time for a reset

and the Prime Minister has taken the important first step in re-

structuring his government by making some crucial changes to

his decision-making process.

In this regard, the PrimeMinister has made four consequential ad-

justments to the structure and mandate of his Cabinet committees.

• The Cabinet committee on Open and Transparent Government

was merged with the Cabinet Committee on Parliamentary Af-

fairs and renamed the Cabinet Committee on Open Transpar-

ent Government and Parliament, thus making the explicit link

between open government and parliamentary reform.

• He created a Cabinet Committee on Litigation Management

and appointed Dominic LeBlanc as its first chair, sending the

unmistakable signal that there is a need to corral the spiraling

costs of legal and other costs of litigation.

• The Cabinet committee on Inclusive Growth, Opportunities

and Innovation has been renamed the Cabinet Committee on

Growing the Middle Class to refocus the committee’s and citi-

zens’ attention on the middle class which, at this point, will be

the battle ground for the next federal election.

• The former Committee on Defense Procurement and the Sub-

committee on Canada US relations have been given full com-

mittee status to emphasize the need to make decisions about

key procurement acquisitions and to prepare for a newly elect-

ed president in November.

Collectively, these changes signal the emerging priorities of this

government and also underscore the Prime Minister’s ongoing

commitment to the involvement of as many of his ministers as

possible in decision-making. As a result of these changes, the Min-

istry now includes 11 cabinet committees which range in mem-

bership size from 7 to 13 members. By way of comparison with

previous administrations, the current committee system stands

in stark contrast to Jean Chrétien’s government which used only

four permanent committees over its ten years.

While the Prime Minister has resisted the temptation to create

an executive committee such as a Priorities and Planning used

by his predecessor, the refashioned Agenda, Results and Commu-

nications Committee effectively plays that role with one special

twist. By linking agenda setting and policy outcomes (results), the

Prime Minister has forced his government to look seriously at the

effectiveness of programs and against their forward agenda. The

new evaluation policy that Minister Scott Brison released in Au-

gust further underscores the government’s intention to scrutinize

program outcomes.

The efforts to link program outcomes to future spending deci-

sions is not a new concept within the Federal government where

earlier versions failed because prime ministers at the time were

not committed to eliminating or downscaling ineffective pro-

grams. Prime Minister Trudeau has placed himself at the head of

the table by owning this latest effort to attack underperforming

programs.

These changes also represent a vote of confidence that the

Prime Minister has in his colleagues and also signals that these

11 cabinet committees will do the heavy lifting for his govern-

ment. In particular, the new Committee on Transparent Govern-

ment and Parliament is being chaired by Carla Qualtrough, an

already busy minister, who is being asked to resolve one of the

most complex policy files that the government will deal with dur-

ing its mandate.

It remains to be seen whether Prime Minister Trudeau feels that

he needs to shuffle new players into his Cabinet to replace those

who have not yet delivered on his agenda. Since Cabinet shuffles

are very consequential to those involved, moving Ministers in and

out of Cabinet is more difficult personally for the Prime Minister

than tinkering with the machinery of government. As a conse-

quence, a decision to make changes to the cabinet will reveal a lot

about the prime minister’s management style and his assessment

of the performance of his Cabinet team.

D

avid

Z

ussman

is a Senior Fellow in the Graduate School

of Public and International Affairs at the University of

Ottawa and is Research Advisor to the Public Sector

Practice of Deloitte.

dzussman@uottawa.ca.

Reinvigorating Cabinet Committees

web

http://canadiangovernmentexecutive.ca/author/davidzu/