Previous Page  13 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 13 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

October 2016 //

Canadian Government Executive /

13

Program Evaluation

A Case in Point

Here’s how one federal government

group is striving to improve its evalua-

tion capacity. The Public Health Agency

of Canada (PHAC) and Health Canada

(HC) are served by one evaluation team,

approximately thirty evaluators in the Of-

fice of Audit and Evaluation. This team has

always had a strong focus on continuous

professional development. For example,

attendance at CES workshops and confer-

ences, coaching and mentoring by senior

members, and “lunch and learn” events

have contributed to the development of

team members’ skills. All of these strate-

gies served the team well, but there still

was a desire for more formal recognition

of the team’s competence.

An important realization occurred in

July 2015 when the evaluation team was

combined with the audit team in one cor-

porate office. It became evident that the

federal audit function was more mature

than evaluation in terms of its approach

to professionalization. Audit designations

were recognized in job descriptions and

their pursuit and maintenance were sup-

ported by federal policy. This was not yet

true for evaluation.

As a result, a business case was put

forward to senior management to have

the same recognition and support for

evaluation designations that was already

available for auditors. The concept was

approved in March, 2016. Immediately,

a study group was created to support in-

terested team members’ pursuit of the

CE designation. Speakers were invited to

discuss such topics as the credentialing

process, what Credentialing Board mem-

bers were looking for in a CE application,

and what CEs themselves had to say about

their experience. The group continues to

meet to support evaluators as they work

through their application portfolios and

the team is excited about the number of

designations that are underway or have

already been attained.

Now What?

In 2012/13, under the 2009 federal policy,

there were 459 full time equivalents in

the Federal Government involved in the

completion of 123 evaluations at a total

cost of $56.2 million including salary,

O&M and professional services. With the

strong focus on results and additional

flexibilities in the new policy, and the im-

portant role that evaluation can play in

giving decision makers access to the best

possible information necessary, the po-

tential consequences could be significant

as all federal agencies aim to improve

their evaluation capacity.

But this is only the beginning of the

story. As evaluators work towards greater

competence, they will discover, just as oth-

er professionals have, that the emphasis

then shifts to continuing education. In the

case of the CE, maintenance requirements

demand the completion and reporting of

40 hours of professional development ev-

ery three years. Early feedback suggests

that evaluators actually welcome this re-

quirement because they can legitimately

pursue their own continued improvement,

actively seeking out appropriate training.

Hopefully, as these activities drive home

the professionalization of Canadian fed-

eral evaluators, it will contribute to the

increased recognition of evaluation as an

important profession in government and

this in turn will lead to better outcomes for

federal program participants.

Harry Cummings, PhD, RPP, Shelley

Borys, PhD, CE, Gail Vallance

Barrington, PhD, CE

your business in focus PUT YOUR BUSINESS IN FOCUS hrpa.ca/ infocus Only HR professionals with a CHRP , CHRL or CHRE designation have a deep understanding of how businesses work and are trained to be high-impact leaders. Let a Certified Human Resources Professional , Leader or Executive show you how their achievements set them apart.