The right balance: The case for strong plural, public and private sectors - Canadian Government Executive
Bookshelf with Harvey Schachter
May 26, 2015

The right balance: The case for strong plural, public and private sectors

Rebalancing Society
Henry Mintzberg
Berrett-Koehler, 151 pages, $20.95

 

In recent years, it has been customary for government – and government executives – to be looked down upon, while business has been exalted. That has been the attitude in the United States for many decades but it has seeped through into traditionally government-supportive Canada.

Somebody who hasn’t succumbed is management guru Henry Mintzberg. His fascination for good management has always included government. His books offer government examples rather than just corporate and in 2000, with other contributors, he put together a helpful (if little known) book, Managing Publicly.

But his most recent book is different from his normal management writing, an emotional fusillade at the notion that the key to a successful country is a strong private sector and a highly limited public sector. Instead, he argues that we must encourage a healthy balance between the private, public, and plural sectors – the latter his clever name for voluntary associations, clubs, non-profits, non-governmental institutions, co-operatives, unions, religious institutions, social movements and the like.

His argument traces back to 1989, when the Berlin Wall fell and the communist regimes of Eastern Europe collapsed in its wake. The subsequent glee in the Western world led to a misguided mantra: capitalism had triumphed. The McGill University professor of management, visiting Prague a couple of years later, balked at the notion, which he found not only overly sanctimonious but wrong and dangerous. He published an article debunking the premise and over the remaining two decades has continued to study the issue, resulting in Rebalancing Society, which mourns the imbalance we are currently experiencing as the private sector has been placed on a pedestal.

Capitalism never triumphed, he insists. Balance triumphed. Whereas communism had been suffocated by too much government, with little else to sustain it, the Western world had a reasonable balance in the late ’80s between the private, public and plural sectors. But no longer.

These days, the private sector has expanded and the two other sectors are far feebler. Politicians proclaim the glories of the private sector and the importance of reducing the public sector. And the third sector has similarly withered, as captured by Harvard sociologist Richard Putnam’s catchphrase that we increasingly are bowling alone.

“Adam Smith’s invisible hand in the American marketplace has become a visible claw in the American Congress. De Tocqueville identified the genius of American society as ‘self-interest rightly understood.’ Now the country finds itself overwhelmed by self-interest fatefully misunderstood,” he writes.

One sign of the growing imbalance that he cites is in the mid-1980s when Ronald Reagan overhauled the U.S. tax system after learning that General Electric and some other corporations were using accounting gamesmanship to avoid paying taxes. “I didn’t think things had gotten that far out of line,” said the exponent of brash American capitalism. But from 2008 to 2012, 26 major American corporations including General Electric and Boeing paid no taxes at all. And there is little momentum to change the situation – with considerable to keep it as is.

On the global front, he notes that in 1987, with the Montreal Protocol, countries from around the world came together to protect the ozone layer. These days we can’t garner similar collective action on global warming.

He observes it has been said the final stage of slavery is when you no longer realize you are a slave. The East Europeans under communism never reached that stage. Today, however, he wonders how many of us fail to see the extent to which we have become slaves of our own economic structures. When an economy of free enterprises becomes a society of free enterprises, he feels it’s the citizens who are no longer free.

“It is telling that the word socialism has become a dirty word in America, leaving the impression that there is something wrong with things social, while capitalism has come to represent all things right. In fact, we are seeing all sorts of proposals for adjectival capitalism – sustainable capitalism, caring capitalism, breakthrough capitalism, democratic capitalism, regenerative capitalism, inclusive capitalism. The impression is that, if only we can get capitalism right, all will be well again,” he writes.

And it’s not just America. He notes that his cherished Canada, long known for its balance and benevolence, has become another cheerleader for this one-sided view of development. He is alarmed by “a creeping meanness” in Canada, not restricted he stresses to our current government.

Although he categorizes his book as a rant, he stresses it’s not a rant against business. He admires businesses that compete responsibly to bring him worthwhile products and services. But he has disdain for those that try to exploit him with shoddy products, indifferent services, shady pricing, and phony advertising – and he feels such corporations are on the upswing, as the stock market demands greater and greater growth. He also dislikes companies that seek to exploit us by using political advertising to sway opinions on public issues, take government handouts in the name of free enterprise, and use vast sums of money to lobby for their privileged interests.

“There’s a tea party going on, all right, for big business, under the slogan ‘no taxation with representation’,” he says.

But he’s not urging tearing down the private sector in favour of government. He feels a country will suffer if any one of the three sectors is given too much power. Balance is the key.

Too much capitalism becomes the predatory capitalism we increasingly see. Too much government and we can end up with state despotism. If the plural sectors become excessive we can be hit by exclusive populism, where some segment dominates society, excluding others, as with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt or the social movement that served as the seed of Nazi Germany.

He mourns the emasculation of government. He recalls that under the supposed win-win of communism, the state was supposed to “wither away.” Now capitalism is working on that instead – at least for departments that don’t serve its purposes.

As someone whose first full-time job was with Canadian National, then the most progressive railway in the world and state owned, and an avid listener to CBC radio, he can’t understand the relentless push to privatize public services. He points out that in the U.S. presidential elections in 2012, while private interests were spending billions on the campaigns, some state governments lacked the funds to staff their polling booths. Who can expect decent public services, he asks, when there is little respect for public service?

“Meanwhile, under the banner of ‘New Public Management,’ a euphemism for old corporate practices, public services that cannot be turned into business are supposed to pretend that they are businesses: Put heroic leaders in charge, reorganize constantly, measure like mad, and reengineer everything in sight,” he writes.

“Most activities are in government because they cannot be managed like businesses. How is diplomacy supposed to be so managed? How do you measure what a child learns in a classroom without destroying the quality of education? A senior British public servant, when asked why there had been such a profusion of measurement in his ministry, replied, ‘What else are we to do when we don’t understand what’s going on?’ How about trying to connect, to communicate, even to use judgment?” he writes.

A major contribution to our understanding comes from his naming of the non-business, non-government part of our society. It has previously been inadequately labelled the non-profit sector, the third sector, and even civil society, but plural captures its breadth, the impetus it receives from people, and neatly starts with a letter P to match the other two sectors. Many government executives deal with the plural sector, and this might help understand its function.

The plural sector comprises all associations of people that are owned neither by the state not by private investors. Some are owned by members; others are owned by nobody, like universities. “By virtue of being owned by their members or by no one, plural sector associations can be more egalitarian and flexible,” he observes. The greatest ideological cheerleaders for capitalism, he loves to point out, have been the economists at the University of Chicago, which has no owner and is part of the plural sector.

The plural sector is not “a third way” between the two other sectors. It is part of a balanced society, something that triumphed in 1989 but is shakier today. This book is short, but impassioned, and makes the case for strong plural, public and private sectors. The case for balance.

About this author

Harvey Schachter

Harvey Schachter is a writer, specializing in management and business issues. He writes three weekly columns for the Globe and Mail and The Leader’s Bookshelf column for Canadian Government Executive, and a regular column and features for Kingston Life magazine. Harvey was editor of the 2004 book Memos to the Prime Minister: What Canada Can Be in the 21st Century. He was the ghostwriter on The Three Pillars of Public Management by Ole Ingstrup and Paul Crookall, and editor of Getting Clients, Keeping Clients by Dan Richards. A McGill commerce graduate, Harvey spent more than 15 years in a variety of positions at The Kingston Whig-Standard, including editor and planning and promotions manager. He won two National Newspaper Awards for his writing and a national Owl Award for a marketing program he created at the newspaper.

0 comments

There are no comments for this post yet.

Be the first to comment. Click here.

Bookshelf with Harvey Schachter
 
At work, we are often trying to satisfy a bundle of expectations, which can be boiled down to those expectations we place upon ourselves and those placed by others. In government, of course, those outer expectations can be powerful, handed down from the public, the minister, and our immediate boss. But we all react differently,...
 
We learned in grade school that one plus one equals two, but when we are faced with two choices in decision-making – and usually decisions end up framed around two possibilities — our approach might be described as one versus one equals one. We discard the lesser choice and move on with the better one....
 
Did your high school valedictorian go on to achieve greatness? High schools select their valedictorians because they show promise and exemplify the best the school has to offer. So it’s not unreasonable for us to expect them to achieve great things. Many achieve success in their future careers. But greatness tends to be rare. And...
 
Yogi Berra, Maurice (The Rocket) Richard, Bill Russell, Michael Jordan, and Derek Jeter. Five elite athletes who led championship teams. However, there’s a difference between them – a critical difference – that could be important to government executives seeking to be more effective at work. Three of those stars – Berra, Richard, and Russell –...
 
Radical candour sounds rather outré as a prescription for government executives. Careful caution is often the norm. But consultant Kim Scott believes candor is critical for relationships and internal organizational communications. And if that doesn’t convince you, her new book, Radical Candor, still has some terrific ideas to improve your weekly schedule of meetings and...
 
Innovation is prized and praised these days at work, even in government. We are supposed to relish creative change. But what if the reality is that humans instinctively reject such change? Jennifer Mueller, a social psychologist at the University of San Diego who has focused on creativity, is making waves with her claim that our...
 
Leading the Unleadable By Alan Willett Your team probably includes some difficult people. You may not have chosen them – they could have been inherited – but they are your responsibility, even if at times you don’t know what to do. Should you shunt them off onto a project? Chastise them in public? Ignore the...
 
If you want to learn from mistakes in how to handle an interview, you could take a lesson from Jimmy Carter, Henry Kissinger, Edward Kennedy, and Alexander Haig. The three public figures all had celebrated careers. But each also had one moment when they badly flubbed an interview. Jimmy Carter admitted to Playboy he had...
 
As understanding of social behaviour increases through intensified research, many government executives are learning about the art of nudging. Governments are establishing nudge units to encourage the citizenry to adopt desired behaviours and, less formally, ministries are trying other routes than laws and regulations to get results. Related posts: Where you sit is where you stand...
 
We curse meetings, but they are essential to today’s collaborative leadership approach. We may long to eliminate them – and no doubt some could be trimmed – but the bigger issue is to make the ones we have more effective. Richard Lent, a Boston-area consultant who has spent 25 years trying to improve his meetings,...
 
Government is replete with silos. Like the weather, everyone complains about them but nobody does much to change it. And if they try, they often find the silos sturdier than expected. That’s why Gillian Tett’s The Silo Effect is an interesting book for government executives. Primarily about business, it still includes government, which is rare...
 
Words, words, words. Blah, blah, blah. Our days – our work lives – are punctuated by a sea of words. We use words to communicate. We use words to not communicate. We use words to share our ideas, to propel our innovation. Think of a recent meeting and you’ll likely think of blah, blah, blah....
 
Government executives are writers. Maybe not like Margaret Atwood or Joseph Boyden, but they pound out words every day themselves on their keyboard, in emails, memos, and other missives. Unfortunately, a lot of what they write is crap—poorly composed, jammed with jargon, and designed in parts, perhaps large parts, to obfuscate in order to avoid...
 
Gladwell made Anders Ericsson famous—or, at least, his research work. A professor of psychology at Florida State University, Ericsson conducted the study of violinists that the best-selling journalist glamourized in his book Outliers, imprinting on our consciousness that 10,000 hours of practice will make you a master at whatever task you devote such attention to....
 
Every evening, Marshall Goldsmith pays an associate to call and ask a series of questions about his behaviour that day. As a high-profile executive coach, he knows how difficult it is for top leaders to cleanse themselves of destructive behaviours. He makes his clients accountable to the people around them in order to heighten the...
 
Let’s resume last month’s discussion on effective change initiatives with some popcorn. Specifically, an experiment some psychologists dreamed up in which they handed a soft drink and a free bucket of popcorn to everyone arriving at a suburban Chicago movie theatre in 2000 to catch a Mel Gibson flick. It may sound like a good...
 
David Dingwall is familiar to many government executives for his role in the Chrétien government where he held several cabinet posts, from public works to health. He later became a government executive himself, presiding over the Royal Canadian Mint, improving operations to the point the organization secured its first surplus in a number of years....
 
Are you an undermanager? We’ve all been warned not to overmanage – become a hen-pecking, micro-manager, obsessing about details, instead of delegating wisely. But consultant Bruce Tulgan believes the opposite, under-management, is epidemic. Indeed, he insists it’s hiding in plain sight, but we don’t notice. “It is so often what’s going wrong in so many...
 
A leader’s job is to illuminate the path ahead. It’s vital to keep employees engaged and aligned with end goals on every project you undertake. And that challenge might be made easier–illuminated for you–by presentations specialist Nancy Duarte, who developed former U.S. vice-president Al Gore’s powerful climate change slide show, and colleague Patti Sanchez in...
 
Ottawa’s Chris Bailey turned down a number of attractive job offers after university graduation in favour of something even more attractive: Figure out how to be productive. It was a personal Odyssey, as he tested the ideas peddled by productivity gurus to see what worked and what didn’t, and added his own twists. The result...
 
At the height of World War Two, a clever scheme was developed to disrupt the Nazi regime behind enemy lines in occupied territory without being detected. It involved a variety of obvious tactics such as slashing tires and draining fuel tanks but also included some unusual ideas to sabotage internal workplace processes. Those might seem...
 
Leadership BS By Jeffrey Pfeffer Harper Business, 259 pages, $36.99 If you think that much of what you read and hear from leadership gurus is BS, you have a supporter in Jeffrey Pfeffer. At first glance he’s an unlikely backer since he’s a leadership guru himself. But he’s a professor of organizational behaviour at the...
 
If you want to improve your management procedures, search Google. No, don’t put those words in the search engine’s magical white slot. Instead read Laszlo Bock’s Work Rules. The head of Google’s people function shares insights gleaned from the company’s rapid growth and its many experiments with different procedures, to see what works best. Of...
 
Mentoring can be one of the most critical – as well as challenging and rewarding – tasks we undertake in the workplace. Sometimes it’s formal. Sometimes it’s informal. But always, when effective, it’s important. Related posts: Leader as mentor: The power of experience Coach or mentor: Which one do you need? Intrapreneurship in Action: An interview with Nick Frate...
 
In recent years, it has been customary for government – and government executives – to be looked down upon, while business has been exalted. Somebody who hasn’t succumbed is management guru Henry Mintzberg. Related posts: Talent Management: Steps to a strategic roadmap Savings without reduced service How Horizontal Assurance is Evolving in the Public Sector...
 
Many studies have shown that women are socialized to fit in, not stand out. But fitting in can leave you a follower, forever. To advance at work, you need to be noticed. You need to stand out....
 
In 1994 psychiatrist Edward Hallowell coined the term “attention deficit trait” to describe a common problem he saw emerging in the workplace: The tendency to hop from task to task in a rush, without proper focus on what people were doing or should be doing....
 
Leaders motivate. They nudge and cajole staff into inspired work, wielding monetary incentives when required, at least in the private sector. Without motivation, employees might wither and certainly wouldn’t shine. That’s a basic premise of leadership and managerial thinking. And it’s dead wrong…...
 
When you think of creativity and innovation in government, John Lennon and Paul McCartney probably don’t spring to mind. Neither worked in government and, indeed, they were anti-establishment types who you can imagine sneering at “government bureaucrats.”...
 
You can’t appear for your important presentations in a black turtleneck and jeans like Steve Jobs did. And you don’t have alluring electronic gizmos to talk about. So suggesting you might learn from the presentation approach of the hallowed Apple pitchman might seem ludicrous....
 
We know feedback is good for us. We know it can help us improve. But receiving feedback can often be difficult. We tense up, even get irked or angry. Only part of the message, or perhaps none of it, slips through, as we slide into defensive mode. Related posts: Leader as mentor: The power of experience...
 
Leaders need to know how to inspire and manage, and have a solid understanding of the policy field in which they operate. But that’s not enough....
 
As I rush-rush-rush through the day, I occasionally remember the notion of “cool time” from a book published 12 years ago by Toronto time management consultant Steve Prentice....
 
Before a presentation, uncertainty and fear can lead us to try to include all the information required to answer all the questions recipients might have. There’s also a temptation to pack in as much detail as possible, to show the extent of our research, knowledge, and hard work in preparing....
 
Much has been written about decision-making in recent years, as we learn more about how the brain works and behavioural economists devise experiments to understand how we approach choice. But much of it could lead us astray… Related posts: Deliberating over decisions...
 
Elections can bring a change of government. They certainly bring a change in the face of government, as some ministers lose their re-election bid and others are shuffled by the returning prime minister. Related posts: Solution revolution in the public sector policy space What can Canadian executives learn from the sequester? How to avoid losing steam when the public face of an organization goes...
 
Evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould warned that “the most erroneous stories are those we think we know best – and therefore never scrutinize or question.” He was referring to sacred cows, beliefs that don’t stand up to scrutiny and lead us astray if clung to zealously....
 
Governments monitor monetary inflation, and have kept it in check in recent years. But there’s another inflation, rampant, that isn’t monitored and walloping all of us: communications inflation. Technology allows us to connect – and communicate – in a host of ways not available to us just a few years ago, let alone a couple...
 
The dramatic clandestine rescues by Navy SEALs and their daring raid on Osama Bin Laden’s lair may make their work seem a world apart from that of government executives. But in their 2003 book Leadership Lessons of the Navy SEALs, advertising executive Jeff Cannon and his brother, Lt. Cmdr. Jon Cannon…...
 
If you can be a better leader through healthy living, the key to success in your job may lie in three words: Eat, move, sleep. Certainly Tom Rath believes they are important. And Rath, a Gallup researcher, has offered cogent advice before to government executives, in his writings on using their strengths at work and...
 
Finding mentors has been one of the holy grails of career progression, hammered into us by innumerable career consultants and the lessons of our own career. Yet now, someone is telling us to forget them. Related posts: The art of mentorship The benefits of an executive coach How Changemakers Get Things Done in Government: Intrapreneurship in Action...
 
Today, when emotional intelligence is treasured, Sherlock Holmes would seem like a poor role model for government executives. The man lived in his mind and seemed remote from humanity. He could get enmeshed in a drug stupor or sidetracked by some obscure experiment or offbeat intellectual interest. Definitely not the model for modern, progressive governance....
 
No. The word jars us. Just two letters, but it makes us decidedly uncomfortable. In the workplace, Yes is the golden word, the winning word, the expected word that garners plaudits....
 
Our days are a series of decisions, some minor, some medium, some major – and the occasional one humungous. It might seem daunting to think of your day in that fashion, since it’s obviously hard to get every decision right....
 
Presentations make the world go round, particularly in government. Unfortunately, too many of them are ineffective. Incomprehensible graphics, too much text, and garbled messages....
 
Your first instinct might be to deny it, but you are probably a salesperson. Most government executives are, even if the public service is seen as galaxies away from the grubby world of commerce and sales....
 
Getting subordinates to take responsibility in the appropriate situation can be a mind-boggling pursuit. Often we find ourselves lurching into frustrating tugs of war, where they take more responsibility than we want and then take absolutely no responsibility when we are hoping – and perhaps insisting – they do....
 
To improve your job performance and prepare for promotions, should you work on your strengths or weaknesses? What about your subordinates? In getting the best performance from them, should you prod them to enhance their strengths, or shore up or eliminate weaknesses?...
 
We seek success in our daily endeavours. But it’s often through failure that we can learn best....
 
We seek success in our daily endeavours. But it’s often through failure that we can learn best....
 
As the World Bank in the 1990s was preparing for a major transformation to mark its 50th anniversary, consultants Chris McGoff and Michael Doyle met to discuss the plan developed…...
 
Some title Some author
Some excerpt
 
Some title Some author
Some excerpt
At work, we are often trying to satisfy a bundle of expectations, which can be boiled down to those expectations we place upon ourselves and those placed by others. In government, of course, those outer expectations can be powerful, handed down from the public, the minister, and our immediate boss. But we all react differently,...