Writing Without Bullshit By Josh Bernoff - Canadian Government Executive
Bookshelf with Harvey SchachterCommunicationLeadership
December 2, 2016

Writing Without Bullshit By Josh Bernoff

Unfortunately, a lot of what government executives write is crap—poorly composed, jammed with jargon, and designed in parts, perhaps large parts, to obfuscate in order to avoid problems.

Government executives are writers. Maybe not like Margaret Atwood or Joseph Boyden, but they pound out words every day themselves on their keyboard, in emails, memos, and other missives. Unfortunately, a lot of what they write is crap—poorly composed, jammed with jargon, and designed in parts, perhaps large parts, to obfuscate in order to avoid problems.

Government executives are readers. Much of that verbiage is consumed in house. And it’s not easy to penetrate. This weak writing is not just a government problem but it certainly permeates government. Josh Bernoff, a former Forrester analyst and freelance writer, argues the tide of “bullshit” in verbiage is rising around us.

“Your email inbox is full of irrelevant, poorly written crap. Your boss talks in jargon and clichés. The web sites you read are impenetrable and incomprehensible,” he writes in Writing Without Bullshit.

“Bullshit is a burden on all of us, keeping us from getting useful work done.”

The solution is to be like Atwood and Boyden, focused on readers. In every email and other written communication, Bernoff asks you to obey the iron imperative: “Treat the reader’s time as more valuable than your own.”

That means getting to the point quickly. It means shunning extra verbiage—high fallutin phrases and jargon. It means using crisp verbs rather than deadly passive phrases.

It means moving away from what you were taught in school and the early years of your job. You were praised in school for long, clever arguments and fancy words. In the workforce you were introduced to legalese and jargon right from your first employee handbook. It will take courage and thought to change. But with it, he says, comes opportunity. You will stand out from others, in a good way.

Keep in mind that everything you write competes with everything else your audience receives. Most of that is read on a screen, perhaps a tiny screen. “You can measure their attention span in tens of seconds. If you keep them interested long enough to learn a bit more, you can get your point across. If you don’t, they’ll just perceive what you write as bullshit,” he warns. And unlike Atwood and Boyden, you lack an editor. You have to be your own monitor.

Just as big a problem is fear. Bad writing is often a symptom of fear. We’re reluctant to be bold. We write to cover our ass. The first tool for dealing with that fear is to write shorter. “Get to the point quickly, deliver your message, and let readers get on with the rest of their day,” he insists. Don’t let insecurity lead you to write long. Heed the iron imperative, taking time to pare back your messages to the essentials for the reader’s sake.

Construct a meaning ratio for your writing. Count all the words that really don’t add to your essential message—jargon or words intended to pad your findings or inflate its meaning. That doesn’t just mean trimming off the fat. He says it also means jettisoning stuff you liked that isn’t helping very much. Tom Cunniff, a marketing consultant he interviewed, suggests removing the first sentence of what you wrote. Then the second sentence. Keep going until you have lost meaning.

Edit everything. Count words, aiming for fewer than 250 in emails. A survey of 547 business professionals asking what problems they encounter frequently in material they read found 65 per cent mentioning it being too long. You probably agree – for what other people write. But consider that it applies to your own gems as well.

Since the reader’s attention is limited, get to the point immediately by front-loading your writing. Delivering the main point at the outset, in as few words as possible rather than saving your conclusion for the end as you learned in school. Start with bold statements and conclusions and then follow with the reasoning that got you there.

In emails, the beginning is your subject line. Ask yourself: If they only read that, will you still have communicated something useful? In documents, your title and opening are critical. Both have to be interesting enough to entice busy people to read on. A document of more than 10 pages also needs an executive summary. And he cautions: “Put your intuition aside and don’t summarize in the summary. Think of it more as a movie trailer, which includes the bits of the movie most likely to make you want to go see it.”

Purge the passive voice. That’s when the subject of the sentence is not the actor performing the action. Instead, the sentence starts with the noun the action is done to. That sounds technical, something only for writers, but you are a writer—unfortunately, a writer who has been infused with the passive tense in your academic studies and government reports. “Attention must be paid to the state of our nation” is an example he cites and it probably sounds inoffensive. But the question is: Who must pay attention? The actor, who should be in lead position in the sentence, is missing in inaction.

“Every passive voice sentence sets up an uneasiness in readers minds. They wonder what unseen force is responsible for the actions they’re reading about, because the passive hides the ‘who’ in sentences. The more passive voice, the more uneasy people get,” he notes.

You need to recognize this is a problem, raise your awareness when you slip into the passive voice, and rewrite those sentences. Find the verb. Who is placing, considering, transforming—doing? Then rewrite the sentence with that person as the subject.

As well as hunting for the passive voice, you need to hunt for jargon – and eliminate it. This will also be difficult as you routinely wallow in jargon. And it can be helpful when talking with fellow insiders. But more often it makes reading harder. “Jargon spreads like a nasty mould across everything we write,” he says. You need to be critical of what you write, thinking of the reader’s knowledge and perspective to determine whether the jargon helps or hinders. If much of your audience doesn’t know the jargon you are employing, as will happen with writing for outside government and perhaps even outside your department or unit, junk it. If a few people won’t know but many do, you may want to define the term early on.

Prune the weasel words from your writing – those adjectives, adverbs or nouns that indicate quantity or intensity but lack precision. Here are some common ones: Most, many, few, rarely, millions, cheap, countless. He says they help you to make flimsy generalizations that are not provable or defensible. And now that you are sensitized to them, you will notice them everywhere. “Replace them with the boldest statements you can make, with actual numbers, or with specifics. Don’t tell us that many people do something. Tell us which people do it,” he says.

Together, he says passive voice, jargon, and weasel words cloud writing and are “clear signifiers of bullshit. Writers use them to avoid responsibility for what they’re writing.” They make your writing dense and hard to read. They violate the iron imperative because they make life harder for readers.

“If you want to replace muddy writing with clarity, there is no better place to start than with those three classes of lazy, fearful writing. Cut your use of these three classes of bullshit by 90 per cent and what’s left will be active, clear, and bold. Isn’t that how you’d like people to think of you,” he asks.

The book doesn’t end with those three crimes against your readers, going on to tackle other difficulties and how to overcome them. Given his provocative title, he had to write it clearly and simply (and provocatively), and does. There are lots of examples, often from the high tech sector, and he shows how to improve the crap he has found. It’s an entertaining book but also a profoundly useful one. No, you’re not Atwood or Boyden but you are a writer and can be better.

 

About this author

HARVEY SCHACHTER

Harvey Schachter is a writer, specializing in management and business issues. He writes three weekly columns for the Globe and Mail and The Leader’s Bookshelf column for Canadian Government Executive, and a regular column and features for Kingston Life magazine. Harvey was editor of the 2004 book Memos to the Prime Minister: What Canada Can Be in the 21st Century. He was the ghostwriter on The Three Pillars of Public Management by Ole Ingstrup and Paul Crookall, and editor of Getting Clients, Keeping Clients by Dan Richards. A McGill commerce graduate, Harvey spent more than 15 years in a variety of positions at The Kingston Whig-Standard, including editor and planning and promotions manager. He won two National Newspaper Awards for his writing and a national Owl Award for a marketing program he created at the newspaper.

0 comments

There are no comments for this post yet.

Be the first to comment. Click here.

Bookshelf with Harvey Schachter
 
A few years back, consultants with ghSMART told us the biggest question we face is “who”: Picking staff is our most important decision, even more critical than “what” – the strategy we will employ. These days, in an era in which purpose is prized, “why” can often be the biggest question. But recently, best-selling author...
 
At work, we are often trying to satisfy a bundle of expectations, which can be boiled down to those expectations we place upon ourselves and those placed by others. In government, of course, those outer expectations can be powerful, handed down from the public, the minister, and our immediate boss. But we all react differently,...
 
We learned in grade school that one plus one equals two, but when we are faced with two choices in decision-making – and usually decisions end up framed around two possibilities — our approach might be described as one versus one equals one. We discard the lesser choice and move on with the better one....
 
Did your high school valedictorian go on to achieve greatness? High schools select their valedictorians because they show promise and exemplify the best the school has to offer. So it’s not unreasonable for us to expect them to achieve great things. Many achieve success in their future careers. But greatness tends to be rare. And...
 
Yogi Berra, Maurice (The Rocket) Richard, Bill Russell, Michael Jordan, and Derek Jeter. Five elite athletes who led championship teams. However, there’s a difference between them – a critical difference – that could be important to government executives seeking to be more effective at work. Three of those stars – Berra, Richard, and Russell –...
 
Radical candour sounds rather outré as a prescription for government executives. Careful caution is often the norm. But consultant Kim Scott believes candor is critical for relationships and internal organizational communications. And if that doesn’t convince you, her new book, Radical Candor, still has some terrific ideas to improve your weekly schedule of meetings and...
 
Innovation is prized and praised these days at work, even in government. We are supposed to relish creative change. But what if the reality is that humans instinctively reject such change? Jennifer Mueller, a social psychologist at the University of San Diego who has focused on creativity, is making waves with her claim that our...
 
Leading the Unleadable By Alan Willett Your team probably includes some difficult people. You may not have chosen them – they could have been inherited – but they are your responsibility, even if at times you don’t know what to do. Should you shunt them off onto a project? Chastise them in public? Ignore the...
 
If you want to learn from mistakes in how to handle an interview, you could take a lesson from Jimmy Carter, Henry Kissinger, Edward Kennedy, and Alexander Haig. The three public figures all had celebrated careers. But each also had one moment when they badly flubbed an interview. Jimmy Carter admitted to Playboy he had...
 
As understanding of social behaviour increases through intensified research, many government executives are learning about the art of nudging. Governments are establishing nudge units to encourage the citizenry to adopt desired behaviours and, less formally, ministries are trying other routes than laws and regulations to get results. Related posts: Where you sit is where you stand...
 
We curse meetings, but they are essential to today’s collaborative leadership approach. We may long to eliminate them – and no doubt some could be trimmed – but the bigger issue is to make the ones we have more effective. Richard Lent, a Boston-area consultant who has spent 25 years trying to improve his meetings,...
 
Government is replete with silos. Like the weather, everyone complains about them but nobody does much to change it. And if they try, they often find the silos sturdier than expected. That’s why Gillian Tett’s The Silo Effect is an interesting book for government executives. Primarily about business, it still includes government, which is rare...
 
Words, words, words. Blah, blah, blah. Our days – our work lives – are punctuated by a sea of words. We use words to communicate. We use words to not communicate. We use words to share our ideas, to propel our innovation. Think of a recent meeting and you’ll likely think of blah, blah, blah....
 
Government executives are writers. Maybe not like Margaret Atwood or Joseph Boyden, but they pound out words every day themselves on their keyboard, in emails, memos, and other missives. Unfortunately, a lot of what they write is crap—poorly composed, jammed with jargon, and designed in parts, perhaps large parts, to obfuscate in order to avoid...
 
Gladwell made Anders Ericsson famous—or, at least, his research work. A professor of psychology at Florida State University, Ericsson conducted the study of violinists that the best-selling journalist glamourized in his book Outliers, imprinting on our consciousness that 10,000 hours of practice will make you a master at whatever task you devote such attention to....
 
Every evening, Marshall Goldsmith pays an associate to call and ask a series of questions about his behaviour that day. As a high-profile executive coach, he knows how difficult it is for top leaders to cleanse themselves of destructive behaviours. He makes his clients accountable to the people around them in order to heighten the...
 
Let’s resume last month’s discussion on effective change initiatives with some popcorn. Specifically, an experiment some psychologists dreamed up in which they handed a soft drink and a free bucket of popcorn to everyone arriving at a suburban Chicago movie theatre in 2000 to catch a Mel Gibson flick. It may sound like a good...
 
David Dingwall is familiar to many government executives for his role in the Chrétien government where he held several cabinet posts, from public works to health. He later became a government executive himself, presiding over the Royal Canadian Mint, improving operations to the point the organization secured its first surplus in a number of years....
 
Are you an undermanager? We’ve all been warned not to overmanage – become a hen-pecking, micro-manager, obsessing about details, instead of delegating wisely. But consultant Bruce Tulgan believes the opposite, under-management, is epidemic. Indeed, he insists it’s hiding in plain sight, but we don’t notice. “It is so often what’s going wrong in so many...
 
A leader’s job is to illuminate the path ahead. It’s vital to keep employees engaged and aligned with end goals on every project you undertake. And that challenge might be made easier–illuminated for you–by presentations specialist Nancy Duarte, who developed former U.S. vice-president Al Gore’s powerful climate change slide show, and colleague Patti Sanchez in...
 
Ottawa’s Chris Bailey turned down a number of attractive job offers after university graduation in favour of something even more attractive: Figure out how to be productive. It was a personal Odyssey, as he tested the ideas peddled by productivity gurus to see what worked and what didn’t, and added his own twists. The result...
 
At the height of World War Two, a clever scheme was developed to disrupt the Nazi regime behind enemy lines in occupied territory without being detected. It involved a variety of obvious tactics such as slashing tires and draining fuel tanks but also included some unusual ideas to sabotage internal workplace processes. Those might seem...
 
Leadership BS By Jeffrey Pfeffer Harper Business, 259 pages, $36.99 If you think that much of what you read and hear from leadership gurus is BS, you have a supporter in Jeffrey Pfeffer. At first glance he’s an unlikely backer since he’s a leadership guru himself. But he’s a professor of organizational behaviour at the...
 
If you want to improve your management procedures, search Google. No, don’t put those words in the search engine’s magical white slot. Instead read Laszlo Bock’s Work Rules. The head of Google’s people function shares insights gleaned from the company’s rapid growth and its many experiments with different procedures, to see what works best. Of...
 
Mentoring can be one of the most critical – as well as challenging and rewarding – tasks we undertake in the workplace. Sometimes it’s formal. Sometimes it’s informal. But always, when effective, it’s important. Related posts: Leader as mentor: The power of experience How to cultivate a sponsor How Changemakers Get Things Done in Government: Intrapreneurship in Action...
 
In recent years, it has been customary for government – and government executives – to be looked down upon, while business has been exalted. Somebody who hasn’t succumbed is management guru Henry Mintzberg. Related posts: It takes courage to lead in today's public sector On the Road: Open Government Part 4 Report calls for Inuit involvement in managing Arctic shipping traffic...
 
Many studies have shown that women are socialized to fit in, not stand out. But fitting in can leave you a follower, forever. To advance at work, you need to be noticed. You need to stand out....
 
In 1994 psychiatrist Edward Hallowell coined the term “attention deficit trait” to describe a common problem he saw emerging in the workplace: The tendency to hop from task to task in a rush, without proper focus on what people were doing or should be doing....
 
Leaders motivate. They nudge and cajole staff into inspired work, wielding monetary incentives when required, at least in the private sector. Without motivation, employees might wither and certainly wouldn’t shine. That’s a basic premise of leadership and managerial thinking. And it’s dead wrong…...
 
When you think of creativity and innovation in government, John Lennon and Paul McCartney probably don’t spring to mind. Neither worked in government and, indeed, they were anti-establishment types who you can imagine sneering at “government bureaucrats.”...
 
You can’t appear for your important presentations in a black turtleneck and jeans like Steve Jobs did. And you don’t have alluring electronic gizmos to talk about. So suggesting you might learn from the presentation approach of the hallowed Apple pitchman might seem ludicrous....
 
We know feedback is good for us. We know it can help us improve. But receiving feedback can often be difficult. We tense up, even get irked or angry. Only part of the message, or perhaps none of it, slips through, as we slide into defensive mode. Related posts: Leader as mentor: The power of experience...
 
Leaders need to know how to inspire and manage, and have a solid understanding of the policy field in which they operate. But that’s not enough....
 
As I rush-rush-rush through the day, I occasionally remember the notion of “cool time” from a book published 12 years ago by Toronto time management consultant Steve Prentice....
 
Before a presentation, uncertainty and fear can lead us to try to include all the information required to answer all the questions recipients might have. There’s also a temptation to pack in as much detail as possible, to show the extent of our research, knowledge, and hard work in preparing....
 
Much has been written about decision-making in recent years, as we learn more about how the brain works and behavioural economists devise experiments to understand how we approach choice. But much of it could lead us astray… Related posts: Deliberating over decisions...
 
Elections can bring a change of government. They certainly bring a change in the face of government, as some ministers lose their re-election bid and others are shuffled by the returning prime minister. Related posts: Solution revolution in the public sector policy space Leaders and technology literacy Respect public service: Candidate...
 
Evolutionary biologist Stephen Jay Gould warned that “the most erroneous stories are those we think we know best – and therefore never scrutinize or question.” He was referring to sacred cows, beliefs that don’t stand up to scrutiny and lead us astray if clung to zealously....
 
Governments monitor monetary inflation, and have kept it in check in recent years. But there’s another inflation, rampant, that isn’t monitored and walloping all of us: communications inflation. Technology allows us to connect – and communicate – in a host of ways not available to us just a few years ago, let alone a couple...
 
The dramatic clandestine rescues by Navy SEALs and their daring raid on Osama Bin Laden’s lair may make their work seem a world apart from that of government executives. But in their 2003 book Leadership Lessons of the Navy SEALs, advertising executive Jeff Cannon and his brother, Lt. Cmdr. Jon Cannon…...
 
If you can be a better leader through healthy living, the key to success in your job may lie in three words: Eat, move, sleep. Certainly Tom Rath believes they are important. And Rath, a Gallup researcher, has offered cogent advice before to government executives, in his writings on using their strengths at work and...
 
Finding mentors has been one of the holy grails of career progression, hammered into us by innumerable career consultants and the lessons of our own career. Yet now, someone is telling us to forget them. Related posts: The art of mentorship The benefits of an executive coach Intrapreneurship in Action: An interview with Nick Frate...
 
Today, when emotional intelligence is treasured, Sherlock Holmes would seem like a poor role model for government executives. The man lived in his mind and seemed remote from humanity. He could get enmeshed in a drug stupor or sidetracked by some obscure experiment or offbeat intellectual interest. Definitely not the model for modern, progressive governance....
 
No. The word jars us. Just two letters, but it makes us decidedly uncomfortable. In the workplace, Yes is the golden word, the winning word, the expected word that garners plaudits....
 
Our days are a series of decisions, some minor, some medium, some major – and the occasional one humungous. It might seem daunting to think of your day in that fashion, since it’s obviously hard to get every decision right....
 
Presentations make the world go round, particularly in government. Unfortunately, too many of them are ineffective. Incomprehensible graphics, too much text, and garbled messages....
 
Your first instinct might be to deny it, but you are probably a salesperson. Most government executives are, even if the public service is seen as galaxies away from the grubby world of commerce and sales....
 
Getting subordinates to take responsibility in the appropriate situation can be a mind-boggling pursuit. Often we find ourselves lurching into frustrating tugs of war, where they take more responsibility than we want and then take absolutely no responsibility when we are hoping – and perhaps insisting – they do....
 
To improve your job performance and prepare for promotions, should you work on your strengths or weaknesses? What about your subordinates? In getting the best performance from them, should you prod them to enhance their strengths, or shore up or eliminate weaknesses?...
 
We seek success in our daily endeavours. But it’s often through failure that we can learn best....
 
We seek success in our daily endeavours. But it’s often through failure that we can learn best....
 
As the World Bank in the 1990s was preparing for a major transformation to mark its 50th anniversary, consultants Chris McGoff and Michael Doyle met to discuss the plan developed…...
 
Some title Some author
Some excerpt
A few years back, consultants with ghSMART told us the biggest question we face is “who”: Picking staff is our most important decision, even more critical than “what” – the strategy we will employ. These days, in an era in which purpose is prized, “why” can often be the biggest question. But recently, best-selling author...