Clerk of the Privy Council Wayne Wouters advocates the need for “… a clear and shared vision of what Canada’s Public Service should become in the decades ahead.” Dubbed Blueprint 2020, senior leaders developed and are marketing the vision of a revitalized, world-class public service through employee engagement and public consultation. Cynics might ask if this is just another in a long line of public service renewal efforts, admirable in word but short on deeds.
The timing is curious. It follows hard upon federal budget cuts and downsizing in an environment characterized by top-down compression of policy, budget, program, and communication decisions. The Prime Minister’s Office often eschews analysis and advice from public servants in favour of external sources. Is Blueprint 2020 a grudging response to placate a battered and disconsolate public service?
If the roundtable at the recent IPAC National Conference is any indication, the motives and prospects are doubtful. Andrew Treusch (Revenue) and Louise Levonian (Finance) seemed constrained in ‘selling the goods’ by their bureaucratic gatekeeper roles. Like a gunslinger with nothing to lose, Ken Rasmussen (University of Regina) prodded and provoked, but to little avail.
The real stars were the audience and tweeters who asked tough questions like:
• Why is Blueprint 2020 a top-down initiative?
• How do you plan for the future if the present is not convincing?
• How will Deputy Ministers report to public servants in their departments?
• How will ‘heretics’ be indemnified for their views?
• Is Blueprint 2020 mostly capturing good ideas dismissed over the past decade?
It was clear from comments that legislation and the private sector do not hold the answers. To promote cultural change, authentic public service renewal is required. This calls for a bottom-up approach, top-level commitment, and continuous improvement.